Being one of the "old school planners" that always thought that not inviting the officiant to the reception was a breach of etiquette, I was in a bind when asked this question recently concerning a pastor that was not the couple's home church minister. As usual Elizabeth Oakes of the Wedding Examiner has the answer.
Whether to invite your wedding presider to the reception depends on:
1. the type of wedding you’re having,
2. your relationship with the officiant, and
3. budgetary and venue constraints.
The notion that an officiant must be invited to the celebration hearkens to an earlier time, when etiquette writers presumed your ceremony would be formal and conducted by clergy you or your family knew personally. Here’s a paragraph from Emily Post’s 1922 etiquette book, which seems to indicate clergy should be invited to the reception and treated as "distinguished guests"--but only if they are clergy of some status, of course. Pinkies up as you read, please:
THE TABLE OF THE BRIDE’S PARENTS
The table of the bride’s parents differs from other tables in nothing except in its larger size, and the place cards for those who have been invited to sit there. The groom’s father always sits on the right of the bride’s mother, and the groom’s mother has the place of honor on the host’s right. The other places at the table are occupied by distinguished guests who may or may not include the clergyman who performed the ceremony. If a bishop or dean performed the ceremony, he is always included at this table and is placed at the left of the hostess, and his wife, if present, sits at the bride’s father’s left. Otherwise only especially close friends of the bride’s parents are invited to this table.
As you can see, Emily’s presumptions about the de facto wedding in 1922--that the host is always the bride’s father, the wedding ceremony is religious in nature, the presiding clergy is always male and usually Protestant (with wives in the mix), and that both sets of parents were still married and would agree to sit amiably next to one another throughout the proceedings--doesn't reflect the diversity of American weddings today. In other words: conditions have changed.
The number of civil and nondenominational weddings have rapidly increased over the past two decades, and the rise of the professional “wedding officiant,” (not always well-known to the couple, unlike family clergy) has changed the landscape where invitations are concerned. As always with etiquette predicaments, common sense and kindness should be your guides when considering whom to invite:
If you are having a religious wedding conducted by a clergyperson from your home congregation, or your officiant is part of your continuing spiritual life in some way, it makes sense to extend an invitation (whether you seat them at the family table is up to you.) This is a person with whom you have an important ongoing relationship, so including them in your celebration is considered the correct thing to do. Most of the affiliated clergy I know assume they will be attending the celebration if they conduct a wedding for a couple in their religious community.
if you're hiring a professional wedding officiant or unaffiliated clergyperson--not someone you know personally or expect to interact with again--you're not obligated to extend an invitation, in the same way you wouldn’t “invite” other wedding service providers like a florist or caterer. However, as with other wedding vendors, you may wish to consider ordering a “vendor meal” for your presider, especially if they have traveled a long way to the ceremony site. That decision rests entirely with you, but should be discussed with your officiant before the wedding so appropriate plans can be made on both sides.
I conduct weddings professionally myself and I understand that budget, venue, and social comfort are issues that can restrict the invite list, so I never presume I will be invited to a reception nor do I feel entitled to be there. Because many couples inquire and seem conflicted about this issue, I’ve put a note to this effect in my informational materials; that way, clients can relax and not worry that they’ve breached some code of proscriptive etiquette. I suggest all wedding presiders similarly clarify their expectations up front, to ease the minds of their clients.
A professional officiant should harbor no expectation of an invite; however, you may have developed a special rapport through the course of your wedding planning and feel you would enjoy his/her company at your celebration. If so, it's a lovely gesture to offer your presider a place at your wedding table. I am frequently invited to attend celebrations and, if my schedule allows, I am grateful for the chance to sit down and enjoy the festivities (bear in mind that your clergy or officiant may have other professional obligations after your wedding, so they may need to refuse your invitation--nothing personal.
It’s a nice perk to be able to break bread with a couple’s circle of friends and an opportunity to reflect further on the wedding and marriage--and, as I have confessed before in this column, I do have an abiding love of cake. However, whether you grant your "officiant for hire" such benefits depends on your specific circumstances, especially when a venue is very small and seating is limited. "© Elizabeth Oakes 2009, reprinted with permission"
Source